Invisible Agents, Visible Risks: A CISO’s Guide to Agentic AI in Regulated Industries

Michael D. Kleinberg -

Executive Summary

Agentic AI is defined by its autonomy, proactive nature, goal-oriented actions, and adaptability promises substantial operational efficiencies across healthcare, banking, payments, and financial services (CrowdStrike, 2025). However, its integration introduces critical cybersecurity and compliance risks. This report examines the key risks, governance approaches, ethical considerations, and management strategies essential for CISOs, Chief Risk Officers, and Privacy Officers.

Understanding Agentic AI

Agentic AI is characterized by its autonomy (independent operation without constant human oversight), proactivity (initiating actions based on objectives), goal-orientation (pursuit of specific outcomes), and adaptability (learning and modifying strategies based on feedback) (CrowdStrike, 2025; IBM, 2025). Unlike generative AI, which primarily creates content, agentic systems autonomously manage workflows and decisions across complex environments.

Critical Risks and Industry Implications

Lack of Visibility: The Shadow AI Dilemma

Employees increasingly use unsanctioned AI tools, leading to "shadow AI," which operates outside official monitoring and controls. Microsoft (2024) found that 78% of employees utilize AI tools without explicit authorization, creating blind spots in security oversight.

  • Healthcare Example: Unauthorized AI tools analyzing Protected Health Information (PHI) without HIPAA compliance safeguards.
  • Financial Services Example: Analysts using third-party AI to model customer credit risk, potentially violating regulatory compliance (Microsoft, 2024).

Autonomous Decisions Without Oversight

Agentic AI can independently execute significant decisions, posing severe risks if unchecked. Research indicates increased incidents of unintended AI actions, such as financial mismanagement or clinical misdiagnoses (Surfshark, 2023).

  • Healthcare Example: Autonomous diagnostic tools making incorrect patient triage decisions without clinical validation.
  • Banking Example: AI-driven trading platforms executing erroneous trades outside human supervision (Surfshark, 2023).

Uncontrolled Data Sharing Among Agents

Inter-agent communication within multi-agent systems can unintentionally disclose sensitive data, leading to regulatory non-compliance. SailPoint (2025) reports that 31% of AI agents tested inadvertently shared sensitive data, including PHI and Personally Identifiable Information (PII).

  • Payments Services Example: AML agents in banks inadvertently exposing detailed customer profiles to fraud detection agents.
  • Healthcare Example: Clinical diagnostic agents inadvertently transmitting patient data across departments without adequate protection (SailPoint, 2025).

Third-Party API Vulnerabilities

Reliance on external APIs introduces vulnerabilities, exacerbating security risks. Integration with insecure third-party services has directly resulted in significant data breaches.

  • Healthcare Example: A vendor's misconfigured AI service exposed 483,000 patient records (Serviceaide, 2024).
  • Financial Services Example: Financial institutions facing manipulated market-feed APIs, distorting automated decision-making processes (ResearchGate, 2025).

Sophisticated Multi-Stage Cyberattacks

Cybercriminals leverage agentic AI to automate complex attack sequences rapidly. Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 (2025) demonstrated an AI-orchestrated ransomware attack, executing from initial breach to data exfiltration within 25 minutes.

  • Financial Services Example: Rapid extraction of credentials and unauthorized fund transfers before detection.
  • Healthcare Example: AI-enabled ransomware shutting down critical hospital systems in minutes (Unit 42, 2025).

Detection Evasion via Adaptive Threats

Agentic threats employ adaptive strategies to bypass traditional cybersecurity defenses, such as polymorphic malware, self-modifying to evade detection (Gartner, 2024).

  • Banking Example: Autonomous bots conducting fraudulent transactions that evade traditional anomaly detection systems.
  • Healthcare Example: Malware operating solely in memory to avoid detection by endpoint protection tools (Gartner, 2024).

Risk Management and Governance Frameworks

To address these risks, emerging standards and frameworks are gaining traction:

  • NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) provides guidelines for managing AI risks through governance, mapping, measurement, and management practices (NIST, 2025).
  • ISO/IEC 42001 outlines management systems specifically tailored for AI lifecycle governance, integrating risk controls and accountability standards (ISO, 2023).

Additionally, regulatory initiatives are underway, such as the UK's Financial Conduct Authority establishing AI sandboxes to pilot regulatory frameworks safely (Reuters, 2025).

Ethical Considerations and Explainability

Organizations apply ethical standards emphasizing fairness, accountability, and transparency using explainable AI (XAI) tools like SHAP and LIME to enhance interpretability and traceability (IBM, 2025; Gartner, 2024). AI Bills of Materials (AI-BOMs) further enhance transparency by documenting system components comprehensively (Wiz, 2025).

Change Management and Governance Policies

Effective agentic AI implementation requires structured change management:

  • Healthcare Practices: Clinician-led adoption, mandatory training, and human-in-the-loop (HITL) protocols for critical patient-related decisions (IBM, 2025).
  • Financial Services: Restricted vendor lists, security attestations, annual compliance audits, and embedded risk assessments to ensure regulated and secure deployments (Reuters, 2024).

Strategic Tools for Visibility and Control

Essential tools to mitigate agentic AI risks include:

  • AI-BOM: Detailed documentation of all agent components (datasets, models, dependencies, APIs) to maintain audit trails (Wiz, 2025).
  • Audit Trails: Systematic recording of all decisions, actions, and context for traceability.
  • XAI Techniques: Tools for interpreting and explaining agent decisions clearly to stakeholders (IBM, 2025).
  • Behavioral Anomaly Detection: AI-enhanced monitoring systems that identify deviations from expected behaviors rapidly.

Actionable Strategic Playbook

Risk DomainStrategic Action
Shadow AIEnforce AI discovery policies; mandate agent registration.
Autonomous Decision-MakingImplement HITL approvals for high-risk actions.
Uncontrolled Data SharingApply zero-trust frameworks with strict access control.
Third-Party VulnerabilitiesConduct rigorous third-party audits and security SLAs.
Multi-Stage AI AttacksUtilize AI-driven threat detection and rapid response tools.
Detection EvasionDeploy behavior-based detection and adaptive defender AI.

Forward-Looking Perspective

Looking ahead, CISOs should anticipate:

  • Regulatory Consolidation: Standardized global frameworks like the EU AI Act to mandate explicit agentic governance requirements.
  • Increased Defender AI Adoption: Security operations centers integrating AI for proactive threat management and incident response.
  • Mandatory Supply Chain Auditing: Requirements for detailed AI component provenance and data lineage documentation.

Conclusion

Agentic AI promises transformative potential—but its benefits can only be safely realized through rigorous management of emergent risks. Comprehensive governance, ethical adherence, structured change management, and proactive implementation of advanced monitoring tools are essential for healthcare and financial organizations. CISOs, Chief Risk Officers, and Privacy Officers must take strategic actions today to ensure their agentic AI deployments remain secure, compliant, and trustworthy tomorrow.

References